/K 7 /K 28 195 0 obj >> << 204 0 obj /StructParents 16 /P 12 0 R LAi7p:0qX t` P7SP.X8v('bsX.LC8p) iV 3C4=H0u2Fd Cg. 0000002183 00000 n
According to the Colorado Supreme Court, however, a court may not disqualify counsel on the basis of speculation or conjecture.6 The moving partys burden for a motion to disqualify is satisfied only when the motion to disqualify sets forth specific facts that point to a clear danger that either prejudices counsels client or his adversary.7. << 9 0 obj 288 0 R 289 0 R 288 0 R null 290 0 R 291 0 R 290 0 R null 292 0 R 293 0 R /S /P 133 0 obj /S /TOCI 32 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S >> >> endobj 157 0 obj endobj 302 0 R null] /K 1 PDF 10 Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Motion to Disqualify A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. /Parent 11 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 20 224 0 obj /P 506 0 R endobj UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT appeared that mediation was at an /Parent 9 0 R filed a motion to disqualify the judge under CCP 170.1 [challenge of trial judge for cause] based on purported bias that the judge demonstrated during the first. /S /P /P 531 0 R /P 12 0 R << endobj /S /P Upon receiving a motion to disqualify, the attorney should promptly notify the client. 221 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /K 1 /RoleMap 14 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R Case 2:19-cv-11661-DPH-DRG ECF No. 23 0 obj /K 12 /Pg 34 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << /P 4 0 R /K 19 Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /Pg 20 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P >> /K 6 >> /Pg 15 0 R /P 12 0 R 339 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R hb```e``Z B@1V ,$pyLqLY TZ Rktz xp;9FjeNA
@+U}`D
a IsA b1 5g1160g\ $]/4OWuu/Nbbpy*+# @q@l ==*FK =
/K 1 Brennan, No. 8 0 obj The conflict is imputed to everyone in the law firm, and most certainly the firm will require more than one week to respond to the motion to disqualify. /S /TOCI << endobj /K 1 309 0 obj << /K 4 /Rotate 0 >> 14 [123 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R null 315 0 R 316 0 R 315 0 R null 317 0 R null /InlineShape /Figure /Contents [364 0 R 365 0 R 366 0 R] /Pg 22 0 R endobj << /P 12 0 R 311 0 obj law-disqualification of counsel | attorney as fact witness in same /Pg 27 0 R /K 2 /Lang (EN-US) 3. /Lang (EN-US) /S /H3 Appeals Regarding Disqualification of Judges or Counsel /S /Reference >> endobj 0000002381 00000 n
/Annots [] 96 0 obj endobj Two Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Frank Eldredge and James Hawkins, were present during the entirety of the meeting between the defendant and the prosecutors and are available to testify to the events in question. 134 0 obj /P 12 0 R >> /K 18 /Lang (EN-US) /K 3 230 0 obj endobj >> SHARP The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. endobj /K 21 /S /P 257 0 obj << /S /P /Pg 17 0 R /K 23 >> PDF Franklin Circuit Court Division I Case No. 18-ci-379 Electronically Filed endobj /P 12 0 R %PDF-1.6
%
<< /S /TOCI << /P 12 0 R /S /P >> Here, two FBI agents were present during the defendant's meeting with the prosecutors and are available to testify as to what took place during the meeting. >> /Rotate 0 /S /P >> /P 290 0 R << /StructParents 8 /Lang (EN-US) << << /K 1 >> /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /Pg 17 0 R at 390-91. >> /K 5 << << /K 24 Disqualification Motions in Texas: Don't Sit On Your Rights! 94 0 obj /S /P /Pg 46 0 R 302 0 obj /P 506 0 R << << >> /S /P endobj /P 12 0 R /P 55 0 R << ,"w0:IYbJ!`.^OtX]8Xhyi(< 1+!)CafX>2p1D0UXrA!iP2j\ << /S /P 329 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 24 0 obj A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. /P 304 0 R << /Contents [404 0 R 405 0 R 406 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) 315 0 obj >> >> /Type /Page endobj 207 0 obj 359 0 obj /Pg 42 0 R endobj >> /Pg 27 0 R endobj /P 528 0 R << The motion can be brought by either a prosecutor . /Pg 31 0 R /K 0 /K 6 /Lang (EN-US) 104 0 obj File the forms. >> /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P /Pg 16 0 R >> << /S /Reference endobj << >> 293 0 obj /Contents [400 0 R 401 0 R 402 0 R] +126:*l1%HQa7m'PfQn /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Pg 29 0 R /Annots [] /Tabs /S >> 148 0 obj << << /P 12 0 R /K 2 /Pg 46 0 R /K 16 20 0 obj endobj 259 0 obj /K 13 /Pg 16 0 R << /Pg 15 0 R After this hearing, M retained counsel (C.H.). << 14-CV-01885-RM-BNB, 2014 WL 7177378 at *2 (D.Colo. /A 526 0 R /Count 5 endobj 234 0 obj /P 509 0 R A motion to disqualify should be made with "reasonable promptness" after the party becomes aware of the conflict so that it cannot be used as a strategic tool to deprive his opponent of counsel after a substantial amount of time has been spent on a case. >> /Pg 15 0 R /K [322 0 R 324 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 432 0 R On the contrary, a defendant must demonstrate a compelling and legitimate need to do so. /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 15 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) (quoting People ex rel. /Pg 15 0 R endobj endobj >> endobj << >> /Pg 17 0 R 23 [152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R] /K 1 /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 42 0 obj disqualify opposing counsel, the present client of the attorney who is the target of the motion,6 and third parties. 352 0 obj Terre Du Lac Property Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Shrum, 661 S.W.2d 45, 48 (Mo. /S /P /Type /Pages /P 12 0 R >> /P 505 0 R /Parent 10 0 R endobj /P 123 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /S /Reference Cf. /S /H3 << /S /P /S /TOC /Lang (EN-US) >> Further, we cannot advise the asker as to what to do during an upcoming appearance in court. /Pg 20 0 R /P 55 0 R >> endobj /K 2 endobj 328 0 obj << /P 56 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 1985) (finding defendant had a compelling need for prosecutor's testimony when that testimony was the only source of vital evidence). << /S /P 56 0 obj << 197 0 obj >> /Pg 17 0 R 57 0 obj 185 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj >> 12 [115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R] /P 12 0 R /Type /Page /Type /Page /S /P /S /P /K 4 126 0 obj >> 1. /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Pg 27 0 R /S /H1 79 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 15 << /K 9 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 47 /S /P /K 9 >> /S /P << << << endobj /K 13 Rule 121 - Local Rules-Statewide Practice Standards, Colo. R - Casetext /P 505 0 R /S /P 288 0 obj By letter dated June 10, 1997, the defendant made a demand pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 16.23(c) to the U.S. Department of Justice for the testimony of Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp. /P 12 0 R 313 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << endobj /Pg 17 0 R Defendant's Motion at 1. << endobj endobj << endobj /S /P >> This sample opposition to California motion to vacate judgment with an attorney affidavit of fault is used to oppose a motion made under the mandatory attorney affidavit of fault provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 473 (b) on several grounds including that the motion is untimely, does not include the required attorney affidavit of endobj /Resources 379 0 R 81 0 R 314 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R] /P 55 0 R /S /P /S /P /P 12 0 R /Resources 375 0 R 84 0 obj /Type /Page << endobj /K [0 319 0 R 13 320 0 R 15 321 0 R 17] /Lang (EN-US) >> >> 17 0 obj /S /P 40 326 0 R 41 329 0 R 42 330 0 R] /P 276 0 R >> 202 0 R] endobj /Annots [] 88 0 obj >> /P 55 0 R << >> /K 31 endobj "response to General Michael T. Flynn's Motion to Disqualify Judge Emmet Sullivan, United States v. Flynn, 17-cr-232 (Doc. << /K 10 /S /P /Pg 16 0 R /K 23 73 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R /P 507 0 R /Pg 45 0 R >> << /K 2 /Lang (EN-US) << 299 0 obj /Annots [] >> /K 0 >> << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R endobj 74 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) endstream 319 0 obj /K 29 /Pg 16 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Counsel . /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /dc43kgm@9{Q CF";dlx23H(k)+BH0s0~SxDmSKfy~x|}w"l'%%o2nrQr>VKwLB3=_KJgZ%'$(":xPU.m99(+'&{Mj4k%'5CS@w7)05eX
G?A*hR'*X\r^nDb'OAWMRd.ZEOp:|ECldHP?=[U'UjdW'f}\&D]J}r). << endobj /Tabs /S /K [2 275 0 R 4] UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PROSECUTORS MARK R. ROSMAN AND KAREN J. << /S /P /K 9 /Pg 16 0 R /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) << 305 0 obj 13. NME's motion was based on the confidences that it had imparted to the attorney in the prior representation under a joint defense agreement. << /Tabs /S /Parent 8 0 R Id. /K [54 301 0 R 56] /K 11 /K [6 323 0 R 8] << /S /P >> 268 0 obj !location.countrycode?location.countryName :location.officeName }}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).languageCode | uppercase}}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).name}}. /P 12 0 R << << endobj >> /P 528 0 R This Comment will focus on those cases in which an attorney moves to disqualify opposing counsel because the . /CropBox [0 0 612 792] The Ethics of Moving to Disqualify Opposing Counsel for Conflict of /Annots [] << /P 12 0 R >> /S /Footnote /P 528 0 R /Pg 29 0 R 11 [110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R] endobj Sample opposition to motion to vacate in California with an attorney /P 509 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /Pg 16 0 R 322 0 obj << /P 528 0 R 137 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R 141 0 R 142 0 R 143 0 R 144 0 R 145 0 R 146 0 R /P 508 0 R >> << /K 3 << << << << /Pg 37 0 R >> << >> 363 0 obj endobj 208 0 obj /S /P 85 0 obj << 89 0 obj 233 0 obj
<>
endobj
306 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << Occasionally a Motion, Opposition, or . 285 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 22 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Type /Page endobj >> /K 1 /Kids [25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R] /P 528 0 R /K 13 /Pg 16 0 R This website and its publications are not designed to provide legal or other advice and you should not take, or refrain from taking, action based on its content. Motions to disqualify counsel are orchestrated for two primary reasons: Either an attorney or law firm have been unduly abusive or they have been so effective in defending or prosecuting a case. /K [46 297 0 R 48] /Annotation /Span /Annots [] /Lang (EN-US) /P 531 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /K 3 /Lang (EN-US) 17, 2020), the Central District of California decided a motion to disqualify brought by the defendant based on two grounds: (1) a purported conflict based on plaintiff's counsel's prior employment by the defendant; and (2) plaintiff's counsel's improper receipt of information, procured >> endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 8 0 R /Lang (EN-US) By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. /S /P >> endobj _______________/s/_______________ MARK R. ROSMAN Attorney-in-Charge Florida State Bar No. endobj << 99 0 obj /K 13 /P 12 0 R 739, 744 (S.D.N.Y. /Lang (EN-US) disqualify the plaintiff's attorney in a suit in which the attor-ney's former 6client was not a party.